Whether the petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated when his trial counsel failed to properly investigate and present a viable defense at trial

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ~ Tim not Leting for new Tel, but reviel, becaust of Telauld, ard conSlietlo wth Lawyer ; Cork Lawes . Herren v, CoWind (1493) sob WS, 396. Ud 8.44953, 1202 v Ed 2a (203, Subivp v. Délo (1948) $13. WS, 2499, 115 8.24, B51, 132 be Ed tA Fos, Saye vy, whill™es .S2S 4.9, 333, 412 5, ct 23iy, 128, 8 Lb, fa, 1a 24, The Gixlkh circu Ultimately akCirmd, . murray vi carviers GIT WS, 441X495) Lob 5. ch, 1638, Ed. td 347 NEw Feeble evidenchss wok presented atrial. id, at 324,165 24) 851, 130 LER LA, Bot: 4 THE VabGao cow must 200eed the ively Tmpac ef ail tN evidence” on FeAtonable Yurorar ig, a4 327 32G,NS S, C+) Gt, 170 L. EA tA FOF. Anda Jackson v, Virginia. 443 US, 407 44 S, cd, 2981, I Ls Ed 24 Std whieh QOVEFAS EASUER i fenk evs dence dlaj mse Jot. Rad See Mouse vistete. au $y, 2a 4105 (£1445) Youse V. Tenn dee. SID WSs 193 Vib 3, an (LYS, 1341. FA, 2a 199 1946). ees Wervera V. Collind Sob us. 390.113 S, €4, 863-127 Ls GAL 2A 2Od (1993) Gast Be OF Ad, ab 105 (opinion oS meron, a) : : we Plea eXRective ¢ ‘ io tani * Aw 098 hance “Way ettor dala 64 a ettar claim for" VY ~y leywy didwt Geter with vas! re © gmature YEs of DW b, lavas Aad xs Hha second Pars of Hy Btrickiard 4e0b S$] raw an Ameodmin PC karsainn of coda, PON Amerdmunt Mohit Ad Toureenty, ye @\ C6NAL AWM ane BM, The fe cowd’s that © Denuss inser thy g > Rv lay milefocmed Plea Rat, my Lounge eMowrd ples “WT Tos! w yeano been \ A oT WOyetls ag a4 lapsed or bee, PRyected b wy ta Ct pire whould CeOuAt Of Coynrseel'o def yeyend ma Perfeqmaney 3