Andre Kenneth Stuckey v. California
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus
Whether Andre Kenneth Stuckey Sr. is entitled to habeas corpus relief where his conviction and sentence were obtained in violation of his constitutional rights
No question identified. : Aeod . cle WhETHER oma. SYUCKRY 18 Eris TO HARAS CoRPUS aries \NH eed ANTACOAG OHS chemdhe codVicriod Ade SAN TENC ING eX iyce Mm ADA, Ade ALDIAALA. \HOLATOAS Grourntos S25 pin: THR CALIFORNIA suReeme «CaURY «= ERR dd Fideing Thay MR: STUCIAY WAS JiSe pated Ws sur to seipReptesatyanto! Wisk pe WAS peice “Ye oFeenvUAIYY so PRAPARS Arip Paasarty A mewn SvAVe pegedse AT TriAL Ane senvascinG > a* DID WAL CALI FO RANA (SUPEME couURyY Ew. \a E\xe\AG Fray MR. SvUCKey WAS {Wo PRESUMISTD BY \ReeGVARTIES Ad yas PREM A RAY Wenayas wed We was doy Ausvien aye ORe_RAA TY WO codgtaty Ato CROSS VKAMUIAR FRE Yich™ oR WirneSS®S Pat iA-CouRY. syAvemadys ; eo ue Dip TWO CALIFORMA SUPTAMe = coUhY (EUR IN fideiaS ThAY MR. SWEKOY WAS oly Paesvoian BL Ws ppeerpe Coursers FAWRE FOU PASE MEMVOMCIS clumS of AprenL Wierd ~rHere RQ BLE TIAN ACS ) WY SWACR cF ome, SrveKay* COURT PracenidcS SNSTHCAVIT QoUSA Yo waRganie ReverSél ~ , a . : ;