WHETHER MR. STUCKEY IS ENTITLED TO HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF WHEN ATTACKING HIS CONVICTION AND SENTENCING ON GROUNDS OF TITLE II A.D.A. AND A.D.A.A.A. VIOLATIONS

DID THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT ERR IN FINDING MR. STUCKEY WAS NOT DENIED HIS RIGHT TO SELF-REPRESENTATION WHEN HE WAS DENIED THE OPPORTUNITY TO PREPARE AND PRESENT A JAILHOUSE DEFENSE AT SENTENCING

DID THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT ERR IN FINDING MR. STUCKEY WAS NOT PREJUDICED BY IRREGULARITIES AT HIS PRELIMINARY HEARING WHEN HE WAS NOT ALLOWED OPPORTUNITY TO CONFRONT AND CROSS-EXAMINE THE WITNESSES OR WITNESSES PRIOR IN-COURT

DID THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT ERR IN FINDING MR. STUCKEY WAS NOT PREJUDICED BY HIS APPELLATE COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO RAISE MERITORIOUS CLAIMS ON APPEAL WHEN THERE WERE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES AT EVERY STAGE OF MR. STUCKEY'S COURT PROCEEDINGS ENOUGH TO WARRANT REVERSAL

Whether Andre Kenneth Stuckey Sr. is entitled to habeas corpus relief where his conviction and sentence were obtained in violation of his constitutional rights