Whether the state court erred in dismissing the case against the defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED jp AM Askinte US SWPVEME Cauyt $9 THIET my ey becovs the Stab Coury + by mistetdec sed. VAR OE omy Kats Lede Ahe defendant Auto OU REYS LN SURING Corn Vay” AdPOYNES Cheng my LANSING Mm; 48933. and ulith aud. may (naw /eg ahey Ado fd Lowyey in my case. is Lawyers Kin Nowe 15 TIMOTAY 9» VaNDE NE BERK 250 monRak Ave NK Fee w9)g CRONE REPOS mm) 49.503 pdid Nog veevid Any o¢ Mek Cok is 1, Letters fav sthis 12gDole fo, am Hees depart ion, host Shy zm, Coke + was digmissed ARENA Co by de lends Wnt Ahi S SUPYEM Couy+ +o hear me ang MOTION FOR CERTIORAR 40 US COUVLOL KCLERK 7 Am ASKng US SU PYEME COUR fo yey jet my Cage. : SUR Sdict dn af the Suprem Caukt to review dec: NS af the stage COMBI 1S Presently cad (Led in 236 U-S.C Jaky a), | af Section LS 6 foe, \ Bee yet as cena af sea SWI COYY Act oF 7787 yey, NA Mees dey His state he he 739 vovje FROM tim be 4: FE ade tree dhe mast Veo end beings fhe Act at Sune 24+, 79 SS. 702% Stat “ 662 that Ae abolished fre last vem nands of othe“ arpeal” path 3 vev jew of rang Lin af s+ Cauat Ju ly PVENAS hut iNVolved federal /ssues. Aaw d/l these utho Seek , ee SUCh ev ie must Paar Hoe & Ce yb jovar/ “ Path tae Pith Stok Leads to vey eur On w of cy fem cates he, she y } hase velat\ | Court -in jts dise ve tor wl iswes te lear and dee ide ON ee ve rg S+ Pon \9. 5} Now yeade —