No. 19-5852
Roosevelt Leon Cooper v. United States
Tags: case-law certiorari criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review mens-rea rehaif-standard remand statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-precedent vacatur
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019). i
Docket Entries
2020-01-10
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-12-09
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 588 U. S. ___ (2019).
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-06
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-09-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 7, 2019 to November 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 6, 2019.
2019-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Roosevelt Cooper
Andrew Lee Adler — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Andrew Lee Adler — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent