No. 19-5854

Sabrina D. Davis v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2019-09-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: and SCRCP(South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure 14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process judicial-bias precedent standing state-courts supreme-court-precedent time-for-service
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the South Carolina courts ignore precedent set by the US Supreme Court that clearly states that time for service cannot be reduced and produce conflict among SC C.§15-9-3(A&B), and SCRCP(South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure) Rule3 that leads to a violation of the 14th Amendment in which bias is allowed to go unchecked in the state courts?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED CAN THE SOUTH CAROLINA COURTS IGNORE PRECEDENT SET BY THE US SUPREME COURT THAT CLEARLY STATES THAT TIME FOR SERVICE CANNOT BE REDUCED AND PRODUCE CONFLICT AMONG , SC C.§15-9-3(A&B), and SCRCP(South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure) Rule3 THAT LEADS TO A VIOLATION OF THE 147? AMENDMENT IN WHICH BIAS IS ALLOWED TO GO UNCHECKED IN THE STATE COURTS?

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent Bankers Life and Casualty Company to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Bankers Life and Casualty Company
Ronald Edward Elberger — Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Respondent
Ronald Edward Elberger — Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Respondent
Sabrina D. Davis
Sabrina D. Davis — Petitioner
Sabrina D. Davis — Petitioner