Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the respondent United Airlines denied the petitioner boarding on a flight due to the petitioner's disability

No question identified. : , G Cea tonne Padbenren Case. No" cv 0188 Neo (4. |, Crystyll Brton craig th Danelle, BHon ry daugt?, 4° 1 ? when ioctl nl United eee £ of Unrted Aininas seen tt AW oy Kul intortraln 4oKelin-ts sed +o de, ie of Het Fd snl anal Cte ms le ela il Ponlalergstal pufchesed. try Tougr Td Yothscty dk dish, Con Gh McK 40 Inwolven Ht ae Stele. t5 Cline y's pilot yojeet; That Pe lads she Dine af; Non forte. aay f "si ag ai ce gen Ullinvis, and whan a¥ well foes i Ohtpra Tah head Thekas ane ee eh cen ka eh pla A owh | UR Ls ry Ts fi wien Blames os tex Frc prt, Te Pn ae So as feck ipo hd Sek. ideo ; PUD pI aie He Ft tepphe OC Pra ip eanabanhpe Banke implies a Kyccein Thatigkd $y. bdopuade ama refer Hur ttornay Fran cas MLN WN Als ere Ms, Carin, That: pad rpeegbokcappe deratans ert, Wale ek ri tyage ) analy ai Lng to ratua pad of OWN ryonte fo sas heol va. cone» That foot pe te lecdbd Gomure hen 245 Cretmach St lado rp: To thud hood. wy hle oF ong chase Aewell, that Ru fun mantachor aol Ethege Corpheaeen ahaa th Leet pre ck held Rn Apo ltt ushon: hs I } ite BG Whales > Kove, Baan of Fibeca, Aig io ioeoblge abies ind Pepens ear eye tinsel Ara ay oun N = lu’ hy P {