No. 19-5865
Pablo Sauste Balderas v. United States
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure defendant-rights indictment jury-trial prior-conviction sentencing statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant's statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED IL Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant’s statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt? i
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-16
Reply of petitioner Pablo Sauste Balderas filed.
2020-01-02
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 2, 2019 to January 2, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 2, 2020.
2019-10-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 2, 2019.
2019-10-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 31, 2019 to December 2, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-01
Response Requested. (Due October 31, 2019)
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Pablo Sauste Balderas
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent