No. 19-5866
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court-split circuit-courts electronic-evidence fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-jurisprudence fourth-amendment-protections inevitable-discovery search-and-seizure state-courts technological-advances warrant-requirement
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are the federal circuit courts and state courts of last resort analyzing and applying the inevitable discovery doctrine in a manner eviscerating the Fourth Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR THE COURT TO CONSIDER ARE: 1. Are the federal circuit courts and state courts of last resort analyzing and applying the inevitable discovery doctrine in a manner eviscerating the Fourth Amendment? 2. Is the time ripe for the Supreme Court to provide parameters to the inevitable discovery doctrine based on ongoing conflicts of interpretation and application? ii
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Jason Loera
Jerry Allen Walz — Walz & Associates, P.C., Petitioner
Jerry Allen Walz — Walz & Associates, P.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent