Did the district court err in increasing the defendant's sentence based on the Guidelines definition of 'controlled substance offense'?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Did the distiet court errof in iaereasin Havi ine ides attcoyted Bienes in the Gucdelines defindion of tonbolldf D Should the sentencing Comission ‘inv ke th interpretive authority via commentary. to impose such * gerne im Ebina . defendant wilh Ad grounding in the guidelines themselvect” A What Gnstitubes Substantial Shep! tin” Controlled: subspiice flow — ander; Federal law } a) Can preparalory action Conshihite ay atfenp? under federal lay? gg the Tenn, statute by provicliag an offer to sell constitute a Does cubstance Mens within’ the meaning of the guidelines F 6) Can Tenn, stalute be use te uphold a federal eonviction pwhen the Gay? dode. or guidelines does not inedludes an important element Sale)" ; ;