Whether the district court's arbitrary refusal to adjudicate the petitioner's 22 motions for summary judgment was a consequence of judicial corruption and a 'fraud on the court', and whether the Supreme Court should reverse this 'fraud on the court' by ordering the case reopened and the motions adjudicated to prevent prejudice to the petitioner

No question identified. : The following cases are related to the instant matter, and are referenced within the document according to the below key: K1: Kaul v Christie: 16-CV-02364 — U.S.D.C. for D.N.J K2: Kaul v Christie: 18-CV-08086 — U.S.D.C. for D.N.J. K3: Kaul v Schumer: 19-CV-13477 U.S.D.C. for D.N.J. 2