Whether sentences imposed upon Petitioner are unconstitutionally unreasonable or greater than necessary to satisfy the ends of justice

No question identified. : Gustions Presoited , L, Whether sentences tmposed upon Rlitioner are onsffaionadly wnressonable @ gretder then necessary to oalisfy the ends of Lostice 2 | . 2» Whether Pet itioner’s wife, ‘Hrs, ossice. Lacon’. trial testimony wes Imipermissibly compelled 2 3, tUhether Petitioner, an African-fAmertcin qyas tn fact andicted by & grand jury from which members of his races group were unconSti ilutionauly underrepresented, in vtolalion of the eft , bixth Amendmenls of the Gaited States ? | \ . ‘ . , dtist of Parts Cl ypueties bypipear in the caption of the case On the Cover yptge. Di Allypurtiss do not appear o the cuption of the case on the Cover ypage. ‘A ist of ail wparhias to the proceeding in the court avhose judgement is the bubjed of this ypetition 1S bs follows + Ye : aehn Lge Powmsn, HUSA dfidge Ronnie Greor, Wustriet dide Of of wea" Ad $A Ge Wishiot of Pnnessee. 220 West Depot Street, Suite 423 220 (Hush Depot dtredt, Suite 200 Crasneville, thennesser 317143 Preenevile, fennessee 37743 Per Rule R44 am sinding document tos he Solicitor Reneral of the GInited Stats Room Stiles Departirent of istice 450 WPennsylvanty Avenue H.W. ‘Washington Ib 20536 0004 i | (ble of Contents | Oyinions Below... . | fursdiction... 2. cee ce ee eee. ae ae (lonstitutional 4nd Stufutory "Provisions Whvolved.. 2 2. we eee Stolement Of Qhewe.. ee ee eB Reasons Por Grating the Wt. ee Woncluston. 2 2c ee ee ry ae Lndex Yh Appendices | Appendiy AA, Ag ¢ As .., Pee ee eee ee ,