No. 19-5885
Olufemi S. Collins v. Mark Gonzalez, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure california-appellate-law california-law california-rule-of-court civil-procedure court-rule due-process motion-to-recall parties procedural-dictate remittitur standing
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Appellant's motion to recall remittitur and reinstate appeal should be denied contrary to California Rule of Court 8.54
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether in the 2"4 Appellate District, Division 5, the Appellant’s “Motion to Recall Remittitur and Reinstate Appeal” should be denied and disposed of in contrary to the procedural dictate of California Rule of Court (“CRC”) 8.54. viii
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-09-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2019)