Charles Titus, et ux. v. Mohammed Alaeddin, et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess FifthAmendment
Whether the trial court's actions amounted to a violation of the Due Process Clause
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 7 : 1. Whether the -trial court’s actions — rushing petitioners straight into trial proceedings without affording them with the mandatory procedural due process : , of S.Ct. Rule 218(a) initial case management conference proceedings, and without first affording them with the mandatory procedural due process of S.Ct. Rule . a 201(a) full fact discovery, and without first affording them with equal entitlement , of S:Ct. Rules 233 239 against pro se parties amounts to an unfair trial violat-. jon of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment? . 2. Whether the trial cour’s actions, as described above, against pro se parties amounts to judicial bias in violation of the Due Process Clause of the . _ Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment? | Oe a 3. Whether the State of Illinois Third District Appellate Court Should Have Stricken The Respondents’. Response Brief? =|: ;