No. 19-5892

Charles Titus, et ux. v. Mohammed Alaeddin, et al.

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2019-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias pro-se pro-se-parties procedural-due-process standing trial-proceedings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court's actions amounted to a violation of the Due Process Clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 7 : 1. Whether the -trial court’s actions — rushing petitioners straight into trial proceedings without affording them with the mandatory procedural due process : , of S.Ct. Rule 218(a) initial case management conference proceedings, and without first affording them with the mandatory procedural due process of S.Ct. Rule . a 201(a) full fact discovery, and without first affording them with equal entitlement , of S:Ct. Rules 233 239 against pro se parties amounts to an unfair trial violat-. jon of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment? . 2. Whether the trial cour’s actions, as described above, against pro se parties amounts to judicial bias in violation of the Due Process Clause of the . _ Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment? | Oe a 3. Whether the State of Illinois Third District Appellate Court Should Have Stricken The Respondents’. Response Brief? =|: ;

Docket Entries

2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Charles Titus
Charles Titus — Petitioner
Charles Titus — Petitioner