WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BECAUSE TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO ARGUE 4th CIRCUIT PRECEDENT REGARDING THE MEANING OF CODE WORDS . WHETHER TESTIMONY FROM AN UNRELIABLE CRIMINAL INFORMANT ON THE GOVERNMENT'S PAYROLL IS SUFFICIENT TO PRESENT TO A FEDERAL COURT AND OBTAIN A WARRANT ®O0 EAVESDROP ON A CITIZEN “WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL ———~—_ BECAUSE ATTORNEY FAILED TO BRING UP THE INDICTMENT CHARGED ONE CONSPIRACY WHERE THE EVIDENCE SUGGESTS CONCLUSIVELY SEVERAL . CONSPIRACIES BETWEEN THE CRIMINAL INFORMANTS AND DEFENDANTS WHETHER PETITIONER HAS ANY VIABLE CLAIMS OF INNEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE “.. |.” -AND HAS-MADE A. SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF FOURTH, FIFTH AND SIXTH ~ ~ 7 oT AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS BO nnn OO ee e§VWe———