Whether the introduction of a defendant's involuntary plea or statements in violation of the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination is a constitutional violation under Boykin v. Alabama

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Ulasnt it a threat ar promise by the States Prase cular. Wilheln uthen he drafted up a document. 9ave Lh a. Lf 4H Aina 96s ‘LHe me eC De A TOTAL @ re guest tw th-aue & Piling thse death ptaalfy ° frosecu tor t)/ ho Lan admdtteot he did fhi's } Salute Ga Curd. Ho Taustripf, Pa 9Fyo! ). Aad rn th yatroducfroun of £ACs sy open Court’ a uvolatcon of O my privilege agains? self-lnerimina tron guarenteed bu the FL Eth Amenda cot ho ¢he Lncke Ste tes Const. bution A and a uco La Lena of Boy Kin Vv. Alabama, Shoturll Supre , Bran UV, U5, 18 97 an involuntary p lea r A. Aro when r only got the Bog Kén's (athe Context of! a a le with-out Parole reguest senteneing and or innocents cng ne marder change's Yor guilt Bow ken ° 3 A Zz never Warveof any of my Bey as yesal gyi, Jong a9 eins Boykin v, Alabarg? | qth. me : wes wal uci g the mn by Phading 7: " e way they con duce of the gut lly pha | and Sentencing Aearing j wouldnt it be mis-lea ing Be Feasonadle Person to think they dol vot have the Boykin reghts for Counts | Cue My the mureler Charges themselves ? , } N “ 9-18 FORM Petition for Writ of Certiorari in U.S. Supreme Court 9-18 ;