Whether the actions taken by law enforcement, including arrest and detention without a judicial determination of probable cause, violate the petitioner's constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . ATO 4 Polickiaan decest 4 suspért, willeat & whereas ) takes you off put you in jail, without A magishen te Approvl thes) you'r | Yookénl to a Lnesd Appeneance within (45) Moues, AGN Yourec bound ovGK for deial oe Luedhin peocbkding's . Albhcwch, Uhérs hus not boen ANY Sulven Evidence presenti to thé judicivl offiée to siypgpact te Piling af Une teiminal tom plant ihat’s Nous being en fore tel AQHINSE Gou, FookExt yoni Suieenl oath ot atliematien, Debs Ais . viclate. @ Gi426N3 born in the ils, constiubienal kight’S, Hint Ae guadcaniétd in te 44 ® wel HC pin endautyl te UE Mat teinf bourtS Subjbtt mKntlen jurisdiction to énfored Aas juretsdichon 2 2)TP # judicial officeie Pale Yo peetoem Uhese Judicial Farsetion : of Shbit Suteael ely oF of bck: 7 ENB iolabile anariniée AGHINSS She Fédéeal Const ta titw. Cars Uhé olbele comk dvb contlich with he Suplitive mulhonity oF Vit Colst dation , Hiolwting Whe Sypeemé Inu of vg lisd, without itgirly Wit 8Gnist thi: U.S, Cents, aa Con mntrthiny Sb het of Yacensacs Z . . S) LP A pbton is: détwintel, teiéel, then convicheel soul thew WAS Nive # OD houes détiamnatrel of peobwhlé Chusti, 4 helvéesia[ . 0€ nlon-advbesial heaan}, And we wacoast vias wéie issudel, Care Ihe Judgmént béi Révaldiaéd valid yf Yh flopen tuichons was rtofPeétoemtd to Lvtoeck Arty authouity ? TE he Supasmacy nusé of Mehielé Ut of the US, const, iS Woltted, mes the déeisivas of thet judgt Rulily's Enter césables © 5) Can 2 tudicial beanch of Whe govécmanst Enekoneh pon A Constittiowal duty of ANothéx depaieloneny of Whe for bramnendl ? : 1 f tf