Mitchell Taebel v. Douglas A. Ducey, Governor of Arizona, et al.
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims
No question identified. : FaeDee whety EES VV <SV NL & = SSS vist wf SYS Ck Gane +S vs tgs =~ Yo RHE SENS SS 28 RS kg A Sed ug IN CCAS s (RAVI CEES SSUES e © SAE ALYY SEES A ROD EAA SORE eu cs SS EQLS SS she Mies Sy AAS VEL ae AS SI ERE LSS cy SWS . \ OR et Ress Was po St 8 eh = MO sax 3 Say Pe = \S vp FESTUS \i NS Sees 2 Cele Stee | WN Nay Fe ~SSEoE SEH C Sp ES De SRS rut: ; : SUL R SP ECKRE s OES 9 [] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. Saipan do the prong in CE ae eee se tne cekjoct of this. Ned Tackel +t a (Sov a No OUP ey | and_ | Manicofr Coty Shec taal [7enzent) Press Hatentent Was VakeSan, LAG 40 Fok, ABC, AZ Farm vy and. NEC Efion 1 Ave pil aun fouth puoenly Wich Covet Ecler isin a Kale & i HX UE, BC. biker dismisses, Poacent td Lam faint bibl’ eck Mohip ee ee nso tet, Cong dant Sod Chr bles Ste Dee shouplas fh lion CaniSe tele dhe Ip toi He, AEMerest litzcpeotte Te W)P— hse 6 Leia) Westlaw,Con (eldand—CaSe CALS lactect also acce-tye Leftes, Seat fo AEC Sar snnors oe the ange Shope Sent Lift Dyamber COl7 jh nf ak eset $ Ce gmail seat indir as os elf a FAVE Conseludive False Aacestln Wa —ff20g fou), Te GAM, og WA 1 ane ie Kleas ov es: helene es Bs. 166 AA a I Lbtornle, US (195 Xonse tol) Lett Matos, Wi, ae) | Cab V Coton US, ey Xe Teunesseede Cane y allie ce Ope Carly | BS, 7 D . | Y OOEO sort ¢ 50OF SA WYIOD) Mirela © Seah UMS EYE HL g Nast bya Hed A iawes (ls) CU ie ae Fie; SL, U5 EAO) UE, %. Boi Wioni'< Ponce, V2) STATI) Colle ade N.C: ALEVE) Ceaveels t Stete, Grey pire (lare) ln CAELLY US, PAU HEF 100) SHE: Hafhony Il, AZ 421972) Z Net sevley Ve Crty Tend leypia 374 95) Pombcrois kV, Bisfer us1065) a ackee Vi Kalacs, @XCIC |7EO) : va . INTHE ~ SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. : OPINIONS BELOW . [vse from federal courts: ; : . The opinign-of the United States court of appeals appears at