Whether the state courts' refusal to grant Leon's request for DNA testing because it violates his right to due process and equal protection of the law and lack of jurisdiction because he is actually innocent of sexual assault

QuesTions PRESENTEd ——_\WHETHER The STATE CouRTS REFUSALTOGRAWT ——Léons RequesLFor DNA T2sTing BECAUSE DEAL NiolATes His RighTroDue-TWRocESS ——Awnid_€QUAL PRSTECTION OF TRELAW ANA ——LASS OF TURiSdicTioN BECAUSE HE fs ——AcTval ly ianocENToF SEXUALASSAUCT YAbIE oF ConTENTS —QuesTions PRESENTEd s—sSCS ——TAbLE oF Co ATEATS _,. TAbL EoFAUHoRITIeES ——PRayeR | C2) , —OPiMoss BElews Te RR kT a Sixteen lof Be case . eee THE SPER 108, CouRT DENIES, WTONBST Conn Dara 12.STaG het Ani zou DISTT, MCT OP WALEAS CORPUS —_ ——_Fursuasire 28 use $2259. (on Z-5-20/9. ThE pel Tend APpPsa LS-=. Divisions OWL=,( aa Y-Z25-2Z0l 7_ TBE Cou RT —APPen dix D_Ofven OF The As ona ufasme ——CourT yas feoble v. latéGad. CONSEPLIS-ZOTTAS AP eats Fed TzE wiile C1 Cue FCOn) 88-28-2014. 2d (443 (Fea 19as) —-BBASY v MARY lend 373 US $2825 CUP¢ OL sdat zis (3) | CONSTITUTIONS PRS CASTOR TH SE —AIETLICAN BARAS SociBTion STanidands RelaTinacrethe— ——AAMMINISTRATION OF CRIM INALTUSTICS, $3 2OG)Hb-2@)_ __ The FEdERA L Ruleaf criminal Procedure tigeCiy Ce) ——ARIZ..CANON 7. 162(A)G), CANNON 067-102 nd E DATES, — PETITIONER resus Oscar lather L200) Prost Pkopia_ —ténsouaRespecTFul ly Re QUEST TEST AWRITOF CERTIORARI; ——issut roREWeW The TuegmenTAva OPINION oF ThE UNITES —STATEs Dis [Ris counT For ThE DISTRICTOE ARIZONA, Aad STATE oF ARIZONA DIMISIONONE,__ —Anid ThE UNITE STATES COURTOFAPPeaLs FORTHE NINTH, —_ —CReUiT And The Marsico Ps CousTY SUPERIOR CouRTeETIC —STATEOFARIZONA, WIhis CASE, ThE OP inj ON OFTHE MARICOPA 00NTS SUPERIOR: _ —COURT_OETHE STATE OF ARIZONA, ISATTAChHEL AS —APRENdix CA)_Post.co AVICTION REUEF RECORY, | —MoTron! FOR D.NATEST Ng PURSUANTTO ARS. | — 8-42 40. ASWELL As RULE B22 Wek | BSA Me BFFs TVE Mis Rule, | : +) ON C= -2.015-) BSTOu APRIL 17.20/15 THESUPERIORCOVRT —Summakily DEN Ed DEFENANTE Mélion! FoI PosT=couviction!__ DNA TésTing WilbouTCommenToR ExPLANATION, —The OP inion oF The UNiEd STaTEes DisThicTcou RT_FoRn the —DisTsicVoF ARIZONA ssAltacted as A PPENA(K(B) ow 25-2019 —THe PET Tos FoR NAER2Z8.U.S.C §2254 __To.@R ant Leon MeBA2 RequesTFoRD.AA Testing Pars uANT-ro_ —_AK SA34240 And Rules 2-12, The Cour Dismissed The FENTiow —ThEé OP inion oF The Arizona courTok APPeals STATE oF ARizona_._ —Diniston.ONe ss. ATrAchEd As APPEANdIX CQ) on Culy 10-2015.) The PET: TioneR SubMiFred ART Toa For ReNiewTh, EL ORdeR OFTHE: —__Maric oP CounTy SuPrmion CourTon APRIL 25-2017 He AM/ZONA a —CovmToFAPPeals Disayissad Te DEFendads Motion FoR Pose comy. —DAATesTing Ku Lesaez___ —The OPinmioslokTie ARizona Subse Me-CouRT in ReoPleV Meany —IS-ATTacttc As