No. 19-5919
Marlon Romaine Carter v. Louisiana
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constructive-possession criminal-conviction due-process felon-in-possession fourteenth-amendment jackson-v-virginia sixth-amendment sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the State of Louisiana misapplied Jackson v. Virginia sufficiency of evidence test
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L Whether the State of Louisiana misapplied Jackson v. Virginia sufficiency of evidence test when holding, to the contrary, the evidence was sufficient to find Marlon Carter guilty of constructive possession of firearm by a conviction felon? 0. Whether the State courts’ decisions went behind the scope of Jackson v. Virginia when there was absolutely no evidence connecting Marlon Carter to the firearm found near the area he was arrested? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent State of Louisiana to respond filed.
2019-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)
Attorneys
State of Louisiana
Dylan C. Alge — East Baton Rouge District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Dylan C. Alge — East Baton Rouge District Attorney's Office, Respondent