No. 19-592

County Commissioners of Carroll County, Maryland v. Maryland Department of the Environment

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2019-11-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: clean-water-act municipal-separate-storm-sewer-system nonpoint-source nonpoint-source-runoff npdes npdes-permit permitting point-source-discharge stormwater stormwater-discharge third-party-discharges
Key Terms:
Environmental JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-02-28 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can responsibility for nonpoint source runoff and third parties' stormwater discharges be imposed upon a local government under the Clean Water Act through an NPDES permit for discharges from its municipal separate storm sewer system?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The State of Maryland is authorized by the United States Environmental Protection Agency to issue National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits under the Clean Water Act. The Maryland Department of the Environment issued an NPDES permit to Carroll County, Maryland to authorize stormwater discharges from the County’s municipal separate storm sewer system. Notwithstanding that NPDES permits regulate only point source discharges from the permitted facility, this NPDES permit makes the County responsible for nonpoint source runoff and other third-party stormwater discharges that neither flow into nor discharge from the County’s municipal separate storm sewer system. The questions presented are: 1. Can responsibility for nonpoint source runoff and third parties’ stormwater discharges be imposed upon a local government under the Clean Water Act through an NPDES permit for discharges from its municipal separate storm sewer system? 2. Is a Clean Water Act permitting decision to classify a “Small” municipal separate storm sewer system as “Medium” and subject it to the Clean Water Act’s heightened requirements for such systems without complying with the applicable designation process prescribed by 40 C.F.R. § 122.26(a) subject to judicial review?

Docket Entries

2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-01-23
Brief of respondent Maryland Department of the Environment in opposition filed.
2019-12-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 23, 2020.
2019-12-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2019 to January 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-26
Response Requested. (Due December 26, 2019)
2019-11-25
Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Clean Water Agencies, et al. filed.
2019-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland Department of the Environment to respond filed.
2019-11-04
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, County Commissioners of Carroll County, Maryland.
2019-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 6, 2019)

Attorneys

County Commissioners of Carroll County, Maryland
Christopher Donald PomeroyAquaLaw PLC, Petitioner
Maryland Department of the Environment
Adam D. SnyderOffice of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent
The National Association of Clean Water Agencies, et al.
Aaron Mark HerzigTaft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Amicus