No. 19-5932
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights comprehensive-youth-justice-amendment-act criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel juvenile-sentencing miller-v-alabama montgomery-v-louisiana standing youth-reform-act
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District of Columbia Court of Appeals erred in denying Chavez Myers' § 23-110 motion
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : II. Jurisdiction : This Court has jurisdiction udner 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1) III. Statutory and Constitutional Provisions Involved The Fifth Amendment Provides In Part: The person shall be deprived of due process... . The Eighth Amendment in pertinent part: Punishment cannot be disproportionate. IV.
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent