No. 19-5935
Rachel C. Brown v. Civil Service Commission
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law appeals civil-rights civil-service civil-service-commission due-process hearing long-term-disability procedural-rights property-interest
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Petitioner, and All Others Similarly Situated, entitled to a hearing and due process in long-term disability (LTD) appeals?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Is Petitioner, and All Others Similarly Situated, entitled to a hearing and due process in long-term disability (LTD) appeals? Subsidiary Questions: Is there a protected property interest in continued receipt of LTD benefits? Is a hearing required in LTD appeals? . 2) Do the Michigan Civil Service Commission’s (MCSC’s) procedures in denial, discontinuation, and appeals of LTD benefits comport with state and federal due process requirements? 3) Was Petitioner afforded due process in this case?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-13
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent Civil Service Commission to respond filed.
2019-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Civil Service Commission
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent