When the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma states in a 'Writ of Mandamus' that a State District Judge violated 'Federal Due Process' did it raise 'Federal Question Jurisdiction' that then became the jurisdiction of the United States Federal Court?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma, states in a “Writ of Mandamus” that a State District Judge violated “Federal Due Process” did it raise “Federal Question Jurisdiction” that then became, the jurisdiction of the United States Federal Court? “Especially after the Judge then awarded attorney fees”. Pursuant to; “Title 28 U.S. Code § 1443” [Plaintiff alleged a Constitutional violation]! 2. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in petitioner’s appeal : have a judicial obligation to make a ruling on the appellant’s timely filed “Motion For Summary Judgment” that went unanswered by the defendant? “Which was the very issue and merit of appellant’s appeal”! “Violation of LCvR7.1(g) “Motions” 3. Was Federal Jurisdiction established by the United States Court of Appeals in its’ approximate (10) ten “Orders” that were previously handed down to the Federal District Court, over a period of more than one year? Case is Civil Rights Violation! 4. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, abuse its discretion by remanding this case back to the same State Court judge that denied this petitioner his Federal Due Process of Law, made evident by a “Writ of Mandamus”? 5. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit deny Due Process of Law, by denying a “Re-Hearing” and by entering a ruling on appellants’ appeal, before even reviewing appellant’s “Final Optional Brief” that clearly established the existence of “Federal Question Jurisdiction”? Title 28 U.S. Code § 1443, accordingly! The local and national importance as to why the Supreme Court should decide this case directly involves the citizens “Health, Safety and Public Welfare” on federally funded airports.