No. 19-5941

Roger Cha v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process interrogation law-enforcement miranda-rights miranda-waiver self-incrimination waiver
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a Miranda waiver invalidated when the law enforcement officer providing the advisal involves himself in the waiver process by asking the subject of the interrogation whether 'we agree' that he wants to waive his rights and make a statement, rather than asking him 'do you agree?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Is a Miranda waiver invalidated when the law enforcement officer providing the advisal involves himself in the waiver process by asking the subject of the interrogation whether “we agree” that he wants to waive his rights and make a statement, rather than asking him “do you agree?” Prefix

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Roger Cha
Gary Paul BurchamBurcham & Zugman, APC, Petitioner
Gary Paul BurchamBurcham & Zugman, APC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent