No. 19-5954

Ricardo Irive v. Jo Gentry, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-negligence constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement plea-bargaining sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does it constitute ineffective assistance of counsel to allow a plea agreement the defendant wished to take lapse due to mistake or negligence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED DOES IT CONSTITUTE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL TO ALLOW A PLEA AGREEMENT THE DEFENDANT WISHED TO TAKE LAPSE DUE TO MISTAKE OR NEGLIGENCE? i

Docket Entries

2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-09-25
Waiver of right of respondents Jo Gentry, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2019)
Petition

Attorneys

Jo Gentry, Warden, et al.
Michael J. Bongard — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Ricardo Irive
Jason F Carr — Federal Public Defenders Office, Petitioner