No. 19-5961
Mark Whitehead v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-due-process constitutional-law criminal-contempt due-process judicial-bias judicial-ethics judicial-impartiality judicial-recusal jury-trial recusal trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a trial judge that has had a significant hand in the accusatory process of a criminal contempt jury trial should be recused from presiding over that same trial as a constitutional matter?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether a trial judge that has had a significant hand in the accusatory process of a criminal contempt jury trial should be recused from presiding over that same trial as a constitutional matter? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2019)
Attorneys
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent