No. 19-5967
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-amendments due-process fair-trial fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment fundamental-fairness sixth-amendment trial-court-narrative
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Nevada Supreme Court committed error when it failed to address Thomas' contention that his right to fundamental fairness was violated when the trial court fabricated a story to be told to the jury, when the truth was his intended theory of defense in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Nevada Supreme Court committed error when it failed to address Thomas’ contention that his right to fundamental fairness was violated when the trial court fabricated a story to be told to the jury, when the truth was his intended theory of defense in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. i
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-04
Petitioner complied with order of November 18, 2019.
2019-11-18
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 9, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-09-10
Attorneys
Cameron Thomas
Christopher R. Oram — Christopher R. Oram, LTD, Petitioner