No. 19-5969
Tawoine Aquil Frank Banks v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: consecutive-sentences consecutive-sentencing court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process revocation revocation-sentence section-3624e sentencing supervised-release
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming of a supervised revocation sentence that ran consecutively to other supervised release revocation sentence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming of a supervised revocation sentence that ran consecutively to other supervised release revocation sentence?
Docket Entries
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2019)
2019-07-02
Application (19A15) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until September 13, 2019.
2019-06-27
Application (19A15) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 15, 2019 to September 13, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Attorneys
Tawoine Aquil Frank Banks
Elizabeth Latif — Law Offices of Elizabeth A. Latif PLLC, Petitioner
Elizabeth Latif — Law Offices of Elizabeth A. Latif PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent