No. 19-5970

Murad Razzaq v. Kansas

Lower Court: Kansas
Docketed: 2019-09-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-evidence criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process due-process-clause evidence evidentiary-rules prior-bad-acts prior-crimes propensity-evidence state-prosecution state-supreme-courts unrelated-crimes
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a state violate a defendant's due process rights by admitting evidence of a prior, unrelated crime to show his propensity to commit another crime?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does a state violate a defendant’s due process rights by admitting evidence of a prior, unrelated crime to show his propensity to commit another crime? (i)

Docket Entries

2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2019-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2019)
2019-07-01
Application (19A9) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 16, 2019.
2019-06-27
Application (19A9) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 18, 2019 to September 16, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Kansas
Toby CrouseOffice of Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Respondent
Murad Razzaq
Jeffrey T. GreenSidley Austin, Petitioner