No. 19-5973
Wilfred Warren Sheppard v. Texas
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment habeas-corpus jury-trial sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals has ruled in a manner which conflicts with the Fifth and Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED (1.) Whether the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals has ruled in a manner which conflicts with the Fifth and Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. (2.) Whether the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals erred in denying my Constitutional challenge on appeal to it. (G.) Whether the decisions of the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals conflicts with the Supreme Court precedential rulings in, United States ¥. Haymond, 588 US. (2019), United States y. Jorn, 400 U.S. 476, Green v. United States, 355 U.S. 184-188, Exparte Lange 18 wall,85 US. 163. J
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-22
Waiver of right of respondent State of Texas to respond filed.
2019-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2019)
Attorneys
State of Texas
Sean K. Proctor — Bell County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Sean K. Proctor — Bell County District Attorney's Office, Respondent