No. 19-5975

Juan Jose Tull-Abreu v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aggravated-identity-theft compulsory-process confrontation-clause conspiracy controlled-substances controlled-substances-act criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment health-care-fraud identity-theft sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner participated in a conspiracy to commit health care fraud

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the petitioner participated in a conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. Count One of the Indictment. 2. Whether the petitioner committed health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347. Counts Two through Nine of the Indictment. 3. Whether the petitioner committed aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 US.C. § 1028A(a)(1). Counts Ten through Fifteen of the Indictment 4. Whether the petitioner provided false material information in required documents under the Controlled Substances Act, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(4)(A). Counts Sixteen through Nineteen of the Indictment. 5. Whether the petitioner had a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense and to have a fair trial, as guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Compulsory Process or Confrontation Clauses of the Sixth Amendment, and the jurisprudence of this Court.

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2019)

Attorneys

Juan Jose Tull-Abreu
Guillermo Macari-Grillo — Petitioner
Guillermo Macari-Grillo — Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent