Whether Petitioner Terence S Chancellor's Constitutional right to due-process was violated during court proceedings by the 7th-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals

Question Presented for Review 1. Whether Petitioner Terence S Chancellor’s Constitutional right to due process protected by the 14 Amendment, violated during court proceedings by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in denying Petitioner's appeal claiming “No Merit” in the face of documented “Merit” for Petitioners appeal. Which were raised in Petitioner's appeal to the 7th Circuit with the 7th Circuit denying petitioner's appeal and a timely filed petition for rehearing en-banc with transcript records and the civil docket confirming Petitioners “Merit” regarding the appeal, also proving documented (Perjury) committed by Respondant’'s lead Attorney who was the only called witness on behalf of respondents, who took the stand and was sworn in “under oath” with the district Judge following with a blatant verbal display of (Bias) against Petitioner in support of Respondents, not caring about Petitioner standing just a few feet away during the 10/3/2017 Whatever this is “No Merit” it’is not.