Did the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals err in denying the petitioner's absolute right in filing as well as to appeal his civil action in forma pauperis, consistent with 28 USC §1915(a)(2) & (4)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW L . DID THE U.S. SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN DENYING THE PETITIONER’S ABSOLUTE RIGHT IN FILING AS WELL AS TO APPEAL HIS CIVIL ACTION IN FORMA PAUPERIS, ; CONSISTENT WITH 28 USC §1915(a) (2) & (4)? I. . DID THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT INTERVENE WITH ACTS OF CONGRESS AS WELL AS DECISIONS OF THIS U.S. SUPREME COURT INVOLVING AN ISSUE . OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WHICH BARS SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY? I. . ; ARE THE U.S. APPELLATE COURTS VESTED WITH UNLIMITED POWER IN RESTORING AN ACCUSED TO HIS/HER RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN : . A STATE CIRCUIT OF PROPER JURISDICTION & VENUE? . 11 "y RESPONDENT PARTIES BY JOINDER Statement of Parties; Sup.Ct. R. 14.1(b); For purposes of this action, the below listed parties shall be joined in cause by nature of their actions as well as inactions while performing their duties in their official capacities, and, under color of [state] law, being recognized as the real parties in interest, serving as the instruments to the petitioner's injuries. Therefore, shall be liable as entities of the State of Tennessee pursuant to TCA § 29-20-313(a); who are — . CAROL L. MCCOY, Part-Il, Chancellor, ELLEN HOBBS LYLE, Part-ill, Chancellor, RUSSELL T. we PERKINS, Part-IV, Chancellor; DAVIDSON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT; TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT; JIM PURVIANCE, : Executive Director; RICHARD MONTGOMERY; ; Chair, TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLE, 404 James : Robertson Parkway; Suite 1300 . Nashville, ; ; Each respondent’s cloak of sovereignty or otherwise lesser immunities shall be waived by Acts of U.S. Congress, 42 USC §1983 as well as State Legislation; Tennessee Constitution, Art. |, § 17. . . 10 .