No. 19-5987

Ronald Richard Brown v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2019-09-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation double-jeopardy due-process federal-sentencing-guidelines judicial-vindictiveness north-carolina-v-pearce presumption-of-vindictiveness reversed-convictions sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-reform-act state-courts supreme-court washington-state
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Washington State Courts can refuse to adhere to the Supreme Court's holding in North Carolina v. Pearce

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : . : 1. Can the Washington State Courts refuse to adhere to this Courts. holding in North Carolina v. Pearce? . 2. Sinee Washington State's Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) . . precludes a sentencing, court. from considering reversed convictions. when imposing a sentence, which parallels the : the: State. Courts circumvent both the SRA and United States _ Supreme Courts ruling by adhering to an inapplicable Federal Sentencing. Guideline in. order. to mask the presumption of ‘viridictiveness?: oe mo : All parties appear in the caption of the. case on the . _ cover page. oe mo es : . . RELATED CASES . , . (i) ; : ; :

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent Washington to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2019)
PetitionMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Ronald R. Brown
Ronald Richard Brown — Petitioner
Ronald Richard Brown — Petitioner
Washington
Seth Aaron Fine — Snohomish County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Seth Aaron Fine — Snohomish County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent