Whether it denies defendant's Fourteenth and Thirteenth Amendment Rights while on direct review not to retroactively vacate a non-unanimous jury verdict, when a state constitutional provision becomes effective requiring unanimous jury verdicts for conviction?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : 1. Whether it denies defendant's Fouxteenth and Thirteenth Amendment Rights while on direct review not to retroactively vacate a non-unanimous jury verdict, when a state constitutional provision becomes effective requiring unanimos jury verdicts for conviction? . 2. Yhetier it denies pro se defendant Sixth Amendment Right to a speedy trial and right to counsel of choice, when defendant is incarcerated over 120 days and denied self representation without a Faretta Hearing? ; 3. Whether it denied the Fourteenth Amendment and First Amendment Right to Freedom of Religion to force pro se incarcerated defendants by restraints to appear and participate in trial; on defendant's “Holy Sabbath Day” Saturday, a non-regular court date, without the aid of counsel? ; Whether it is a nullity, Obstruction of Justice and a denial of a fair hearing when judgesEn Banc subject to an unresolved Recusal Motion deliberately have proceedings prior to Recusal Motion? 5. | Whether it violates defendant's Fourteenth Amendment Right, when Clerk of Court violates allottment Rules of the Court to allow Judge-Shopping? i. 6. Whether it is a denial of the Sixth Amendment Rights, when incarcerated, Pro Se defendants are denied a defense Expert Witness on the very day of trial? 7. Whether it denies defendant Fourteenth and Nineth Amendment Rights reserved to the : people, when the defendant's challenge to the State and Court's “status” and “jurisdiction” remains unresolved by hearing before commencement of trial? 8. Whether it is inherently unfair and in bad faith and denial of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, to supply two-opposite theories of prosecution simultaneously driven by Gender discim mative Motives. 9. Whether it denied defendant's Fourth and Eighth Amendments, Defendant's husband and wife, arrested three separate times, same case, circumstances, material evidence, third arrest no warrant, judgment of forfeiture or previous bonds revoked. Six bonds totalling 4 million dollars unreturned and non-reinstated, illegal seizure and excessive bonds and fines. Vv.