Was Mabon James convicted of the robbery of Marta Parfeta in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights despite constitutionally insufficient evidence?

QUESTION PRESENTED Was Mabon James convicted of the robbery of Marta Parfeta in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights despite constitutionally insufficient evidence, where, at the time of the alleged robbery, Parfeta (1) did not actually possess the stolen goods, (2) was not instructed by the goods’ owner to intercede in their theft, and (3) while being the owner’s good friend, did not otherwise have a codified special relationship with the goods’ owner? 1