No. 19-6

New York v. Jahmarley Jones

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2019-06-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure gang-evidence police-investigation police-investigations sixth-amendment testimonial-evidence testimonial-statements
Key Terms:
Takings JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether statements made by individuals during routine police investigations — prior to the commission of a specific crime, the identification of a suspect in connection with that crime, or the filing of charges — can be deemed testimonial under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether statements made by individuals during routine police investigations — prior to the commission of a specific crime, the identification of a suspect in connection with that crime, or the filing of charges — can be deemed testimonial under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)?

Docket Entries

2019-10-21
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-15
Reply of petitioner New York filed. (Distributed)
2019-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-17
Brief of respondent Jahmarley Jones in opposition filed.
2019-09-17
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jahmarley Jones.
2019-08-27
Response Requested. (Due September 26, 2019)
2019-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Jahmarley Jones
Randall D. Unger — Respondent
Randall D. Unger — Respondent
New York
John M. Castellano — Petitioner
John M. Castellano — Petitioner