No. 19-6000
IFP
Tags: compulsory-process constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-rules propensity-evidence sixth-amendment trial-court-error witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state trial court erred in admitting the testimony of two witnesses for the purpose of showing the defendant's propensity to commit the charged offense?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 1. Whether the state trial court erred in admitting the testimony of two witnesses for the purpose of showing the defendant's propensity to commitcthe charged offense? 2. Whether the state trial court denied the defendant his right to compulsory process under the Sixth Amendment by barring the testimony of a defense witness? LISTOF PARTIES OO ’[,] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of . all
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2019)