Did the Northern District Court abuse its discretion in not forwarding the full discovery to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals?

No question identified. : a / : _— \ QUESTIN(S) PRESENTED ; cay 1. Did the Northern District. Amarillo Division. abuse it's descretion in not forwardina the total "discoverv’ of "unanswered admission. affidavit" to the Fifth Circuit Court of Aopeals that sunported the claim broucht against the Gov. attornev orosecutor Jim Yontz. for conspiring a intentional scheme to offer fraudulent — material evidence into the courts mechcanism in order to make a nexus to the contraband listed in the indictment? Too, the "exnansion of record" that hold the kev to the truth of the matter? 2. Did the Fifth Cirenit Court of Armmeals abuse it's descretion in not. send petitioners Rule 60 motion back to the Northern District Court for abuse of descretion ; and to be rule on in it's oroper statutorv statue in the headina of the motion? 2. When a "acreement" between the Court and a defendant. have not been honored to revresent "ownership" of confiscated currencv in oro-se at trial on the date set. and later hold the trial in rem when the oro-se vetitioner was in the same »nlace civil action was served bv virture of "blue warrant" but came for netition: er to wro-se represent in trial is that misconduct . of the court .? &. 4. Beina that oro-se vetitioner can't file ineffective counsel on seld, did all of the prosecutorial necaative avertment listed in his Rule 60 cause’ him to be ineffective as the weaker? go.