No. 19-6007

Natasha DeLima v. Massachusetts, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-power civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process fiduciary-duty judicial-misconduct obstruction-of-justice standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HealthPrivacy
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why did so many partake in Obstruction-of-Justice on the Petitioner?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Why did so many partake in Obstruction of Justice on the Petitioner? Why | was the court protecting those in breach of fiduciary duty? All parties engaged in what could only be described as a “coup” against the Petitioner. Why did no one protect her? The Petitioner was denied due process. Why were the courts allowed to discriminate the “Pro-Se” status of the Petitioner, even when the Respondents defaulted? Why did the court conspire against the Petitioner in unison across the state? Why was the Constitution ignored? Why was No due process for a lawful claim against 11 Defendants? Why can judges get away w/ abusing their power, ruling w/ a bias? How is a doctor able to return legal court paperwork when being sued for malpractice, negligence, over prescribing medications? Why was there no justice for a “Me-too” victim of Sexual Harassment in the workplace that is protected by the Civil Rights Act, Title V11 ? How is an insurer of auto insurance company that failed to appear in a lawsuit, defaulted on the claim, owed the Petitioner bodily injury compensation able to bypass the laws governing compensation to injured victims of auto accidents? How was there ever allowed to be a “coup”? How could those sworn to protect be the predators? The Petitioner was targeted, medically kidnapped, drugged, falsely charged, defamed, libeled, medical data unlawfully published, false and protected data published to smear her entire life and that of her family, & give her conditions that she does not have? How is a police officer, the press, and an attorney allowed to legally embellish & falsify police reports or “attorney ads’? Why was the Petitioner : unprotected by the HIPPA laws? Why were police putting false medication data in their police reports? Why were the Press able to publish protected medical data? How are the District Attorney’s, the Judges, the FBI and the police allowed to ignore reported crimes, ignore misconduct, ignore Breach of Fiduciary Duty and engage in going after a citizen? Why was the Commission of Judicial Conduct unable to do their job and remove judges that were committing crimes? Why was the Petitioner locked out of her own home for several days by a Worcester judge, who used a cocaine dealer to lie & see that she was locked out of her own home? Why was she denied lawful disability? Why did the court obstruct justice and destroy exculpatory evidence, fail to protect children, use Judge Brendermueh| to initiate a fake harassment order & never have it lawfully served? Who destroyed the court record to hide her crime? Why was the fake order not ended when the Petitioner moved away? Why is it still active now 4 years after the Petitioner lives in another state? Why did the court engage in using a court clerk to perjure himself and say he served it when he did not? How can this bias court be allowed to have any cases that involve the Petitioner when her criminal cases had to be removed for conflict? Why was a warrant not issued when a subpoenaed witness failed to testify? Why was the main case not dismissed when a police officer defaulted on appearing? Why did the court reverse the case order and not allow for exculpatory evidence? Why have no charges been filed against the DA, judges, police, & the FBI for aiding and abetting? False charges filed? Perjury? Perjury to district, and appeals court judges? Destruction of Exculpatory evidence? Witness tampering, baring false witness etc.? Who started the “coup’? Why did they use gas lighting on the Petitioner? Why are they allowed to use McCarthyism? How much did these years of stalking the Petitioner cost the Commonwealth?

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2019)

Attorneys

Natasha DeLima
Natasha Delima — Petitioner
Natasha DeLima — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent