Randy Matthew Cordero v. Nick A. Guzman, et al.
issue being raised
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1. pre we Lower courts pecme my avil case oN Lett Most Fertiele The Plawtire < , 2. Cal Re DisTacT CouRT TRY A avil case of CONSTITUTIONAL. RIGHTS DEPRIVATION AND PeeseNAL Whey WrilouT Fest AlloWnia ee Suey To Wear oF Te Day PRioe wementT “Mar Lep TO Furtien whuey “We Fellodie pay, AND Only Allo THe Jury Te Hee AgouT Te Gu sor iNjURy TO My Heap "? . 3. Dw We vemicr couer iL te NeteucT THe Jury 7 Deiweane od tHe Dehogere INoRERENcCE STANDARD 7 af, Buoulavy awe FG arcu courr Wave Kepr My crse WN THE CbuUgT'S PRO Bord PROGRAM so “TaaT HS Case coulDve. . Ben CuReOo OF DEMCIENcEs ~~ . 5. CAN WG CAGE Be USeo TH CHANGE “Te Way our SocieTy . iy Arrecte> BY INjustices jt cur CoUNTR/, AND BRING _ USjice “TB OfAce2 ScoTT JeNe’s |) Family 7 . @. WoW come TReul counsel AtD Tee CourT NOT Poawull/ Move To _ IMPROL “THe DerelDANT AND WINES AFTER CATCHING THe _. ‘NX oeveral SieNimicaNT Lies ON THe ReCoep, ONLY ArTEZ. DISCOVERING Te ATioeNey General DIANA ESQuivel ResimN6iaie Foe DESTROYING Key wipente OF “We Rirle “He Dy BEre2E Rial “2 TW Te Cer Per RatimasT OF MY “Tel To Kea “tte NES Mepis AND MeMBHS OF THe Fualic From ariewbiNG My Teal 2 | 0.