Did the majority below err in applying this court's decision in Giglio v. United States to hold that Petitioner could not show prejudice, solely because some record evidence pointing to guilt remained?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Did the majority below err in applying this court's decision in Giglio v. United States to hold that Petitioner could not show prejudice, solely because’ some record evidence pointing to guilt remained ? Ir, What constitutes a "truly persuasive showing of withholding evidence by the prosecution" pursuant to Brady Vv. Maryland sufficiently ta warrant freestanding habeas relief ? III. Whether the prsecutor violated Petitioner's Miranda rights, pursuant to Griffin v. California, when prosecution told the jury Petitioner stood mute or claimed that privilege when faced with accusations, and/or evidence of guilt ? Iv. Did the majority below err in applying this Court's decision in Ohio v. Roberts to hold Blankenship's out of court testimonial statements were adequate with reliability to be admissible ? vn Was trial counsel functioning with : deficient performance as that guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, applying this court's decision in Strickland v. Washington ? —_ * ‘ ii