Whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing Weems' claims against Baylor, Scott and White-Interest for failure to meet the expert report requirement under Section 74.351 of the Texas Medical Liability Act, in violation of Weems' constitutional right to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Tssue No: he {eva Sugcene Court WA ut Weems oscerted avec cace Viaalhy Cains aoginst Beuluc Seat awd White Withovet. Buk weber Section W.USI of Ia us Wedicad Aialalhy Ker a claimant lke Weems rusk grovide a presit authorization focm velusing She medical cecords af ise, and vorkor Section HSL, a clatonant ihe Ulu, imust orovide an eexqact yogurt wihin VLD dus otter Loe dekerdants ociginel agawier. Hae, ~— WWevins sued Baar, Sot and wbhteillerest ba st rato iw advirh partys wital cotords, Weewts aad no putronty WS lense, ese tied th al ceeords under Sretion TOS) of Ye Act. hath the awd Yedocal priaey Laue pcoverted ‘ees Som. iin yeve Nn enh | anodical vtork fy wack re exgert report (eqpicomnat under Section “H35\ ok Hoe feck: Ave Sue Kerns of the stetute uneonet ations where hay ivcevoneildahy eontliek with 'oath tale avd Yederal aw geet laanunts \o Weewns from nbvencing wertoyious caine? \gue Ny 1 We vi towk Aiomiond Weare elaine tugs Valor Seok aod Wate Willocek Wedieal Later or lng fate to meek ve exgert repack Kuqyieworh pursuant ty Vvetion “W295. But Ynove is evidence in Ane vetord wise Clearly etablidhes Yak Weons, who wes win el inygt on caveys | whith Semmaed Hann Ae Sse information in tne mnddient conoch Wed a Kil avin wilh he court Yo doin a cog, ak oe exert vegort, and wis Hoe towels Wael Lost geevented Weems Soe steting She expert Yepoct feauivement under Weetion 351. Did his douse ks Aisovetion \vu, Me. tvial | court violate Weems coodkdulional ¢ i under Ye grocedal Yue Youess Cause of Ye Fourkernth Cmnewhment? {rue Wo, 3: vbuns ed ait aainst Bal, Meat and Whitelleres in ay, yl, one anus tek toe s ie ww woedical veoords guulidned My Baulor, deol and Whte-Vilterest \wh \en sel ty tha Nr wk wd \wtd Weems iw at toe wary twenty snort by oat \ ime. Weerns' claivns payin Bad ct aod White-titerest were nok tery Rinaneit Vso, eins, Wt Weenns Randamentad viahts were implicated where Weems wos \oiing : deprived of \he and dood te Ky wh ink onvieled \pased on he Tale inforinakion wine Hird partys medical retors. Par Werte claims gaairet Bafor, wat ard Whe Klevest were dismissed in Soventber, Zot, hu he infbcrntion in fe hick gays tnaiea we ws used. ty tonviek Wenn . anh wrtonce linn o life in eoruary, 2007. Buk Hrs told wok have lnagened € Ae biel court bad not hisiea) Weare: claiwns waive aulac, Seat and white Witlevest. Did the Kril eourts Aiomisca of Nlems clans bags Raor . Keath and Whike-Wilevest vickate Weome vig oder Yw subctaitive DueVrocoss Svuce of Ure ted Cates Consttition t (a . .