Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in holding that the indictment was returned within the limitation period under 18 U.S.C. § 3297

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in holding that the indictment was returned within the limitation period under 18 U.S.C. § 3297. 2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred by disregarding this Court’s Jurisprudence, in conflict with US v. Santos, 449 F. 3d 93 (2d Cir. 2006) and the decisions of other circuits in finding that the District Court did not err in denying Hano’s Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal and for a New Trial. 3. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred by disregarding this Court’s Jurisprudence, in conflict with United States v. Thompson, 615 F.2d 329 (5th Cir 1980) and the decisions of other circuits when finding that the District Court did not err when it permitted Borrego-Izquierdo to testify. ii PETITIONER’S CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND