No. 19-6058
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: case-analysis civil-procedure-standing constitutional-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process extradition international-law judicial-interpretation legal-precedent res-judicata standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court's conclusions in United States v. Rauscher, 119 U.S. 407 (1886) in conjunction with Kirkpatrick & Co., Inc. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., Int'l, 493 U.S. 400 (1990), apply in petitioner's case
Question Presented (from Petition)
Questions Presented ; 7 , 1, Whether Ths Court 5 Conclusion s Ln Unr'hed Stiles vy. Rauscher, H¢ WS, 407 (1886) Ln Conjunction With WS. Kirkpyhuck & ©, , fac, v. Enyt) : Tecdiwis Cop, Lat], 193 WS. ¥00 (1690), Apply Dn Reiners Case. 2, Whether This Court's Cone lusion § Ln Hil v, Lotkhact, YY US, 52(1485) ; In Congunction With Barker v, Wingo, ¥07 US, $1Y (7), Ay Lb | | Petyboner's Case, : _ PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDIN . A the puches to fy: atacecdiag ace _nemed in the capoa, Cn
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-11-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent