No. 19-6066

In Re Jeffrey S. Collier

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-09-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights court-procedure double-standard due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review judicial-system legal-precedent manifest-injustice precedent standing
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the violation of guaranteed constitutional rights and doctrine of precedents create manifest injustice?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUESTIONS “VYRESENTED . 1. DOES THE VIOLATION OF GUARANTEED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND bocrRINE OF PRECEDENTS . CREATE NANIFEST INSUSTICE 7 Q. WHY IS THERE A DOUBLE STANDARD USED RY THE OUDIWIAL SYSTEM WHEN ENFORCING THE LAW AGAINST THE PETITIONER VERSUS THE RESPONDENT 7 ‘ 3. WH DO THE LOWER COURTS LIE FoR THE RESPONDENT TINE AND AGAIN? LIST _OF PARTIES AU poxXies apprer 1 Me coplos & tLe cose ond Ee Contr POOE. . TABUE OF CONTENTS . AGRBDUTION —— — —_— OO — —C ~— 1 . CONSTITUTIONAL AAD STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED 2

Docket Entries

2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-17
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Jeffrey S. Collier
Jeffrey S. Collier — Petitioner
Jeffrey S. Collier — Petitioner