Whether the lower federal court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; a bells, fla S his fehewr Oo Aeususk tl, (o07 Ret How er Ath ons » 4 . . “ BearfrJeg ok Fler lew Com pus fy Uunches kates Ui sheik fauct far r “ ‘ “ te Bim ore Chere eege, lower Fedecal conn), Ow Aupesf ‘7, Loe lover Leder ol court ff sue Menreran tea m BPE Es me, States ; : , 4obe: or bert eg oe Petits... An tho n> Qnenfe Malls Cx, writ Mister, iw the Coury OS pw cmder, : : Umi hed States Lo urf ce Alpeatl, Fer Fike. 26 an th Crecstt ( hececehe, « ; yf & “ . four thircus¢%) Nede SYN i Sd ating erroar” by Fay7 nr 52 Avthow, Quenwty, Kelty Seeles Fe appec/ the op shel ct Lege Or see x MO miss iy ar Me Fin or, Ads, 28 YS Uy (rere) . ae Petrten 5, feo art © Circus y wt , | Oven fe. &, tere Seercre y ; FONEL eg, wth | Be sear 7, Logs Secs; ., °F ¢he . ; e lawe, Fede, al Coury, ANSTHo wy Kelis tS A RHE a“, FRR pS fe B, BiStHOR FR oy a re Aedes : , é “8 wa Poe | RK B avd COMI Ser eke, b . ~ y the Fe t/ fuarfk fy Pherete, to Feluee q of ? Meee on, ~ Maly ; un, , aly Wife nsf, “f Fhe So cede, Sector This fetite. , Lue Zz orig of COC ES oe aes well be iw cif of Fhe Course, ag ell ef fur? : . tp e OEE LR Ph ag Keemtee yoy air Kom stene og WS