No. 19-6081

Robert Wayne Gillman v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-proceedings due-diligence due-process equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstances federal-habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance initial-review standing statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent
Latest Conference: 2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a prisoner have a right to effective counsel in initial-review collateral proceedings?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is this instant case before the Court to answer the question left open in Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991): “Does a prisoner have a right to effective counsel in initial-review collateral proceedings?” and , . 2. Whether the Petitioner’s §2254 Federal Habeas Corpus Petition was timely based on the totality of the evidence proving that he exercised due diligence and that extraordinary circumstances stood in his way of filing a timely habeas corpus petition? i

Docket Entries

2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-09
Waiver of right of respondent Mark S. Inch to respond filed.
2019-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2019)

Attorneys

Mark S. Inch
Carmen Francis Corrente — Respondent
Robert Wayne Gillman
Robert Wayne Gillman — Petitioner