No. 19-6088
Julian Madero-Diaz v. United States
Tags: citizenship citizenship-classification citizenship-laws constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection illegal-reentry immigration morales-santana morales-santana-precedent severability standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the decision below conflicts with the Court's instruction in Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 137 S. Ct. 1678, 1699 n.24 (2017), that a defendant may assail his conviction when it rests on the unconstitutional provisions defining who is a citizen
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the decision below conflicts with the Court’s instruction in Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 137 8. Ct. 1678, 1699 n.24 (2017), that a defendant may assail his conviction when it rests on the unconstitutional provisions defining who is a citizen. prefix
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Julian Madero-Diaz
Vincent J. Brunkow — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent