Whether the exposure of cheating by the State of Arkansas and the concomitant collusion to cover up cheating evidence violates due process and the right to a fair trial

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ey teens its Ba “i Ly Alex a/ Lam oerting the exposure_of Cheating the Staré.ot hrkansas th Cnecomit Lf Colly Le ree Cheatin Tooandle anc aloo the Colle «Edwin Cheating Seance ‘see FAYDBIT () in the aac 3D Ct the tree strike Dicvicsal Lerie: se EXHIBIT (Rin the pach. 4. Compare. both cases nothin 5 similar: Case:/PMLIB and Case: FMOST Case:/9-IRTS. th teanethroogh He NCIC System two ifn Pdol Court sysrems het Story Was used, ft AUAS_A Lie nor cane sel /MUeiT/¢.D ) veritcakon trom FDL all feekral Courtti,'sce LATIDL. By, oc 5 Cotinzciek with thece Hing. ot fasre.case deprive my. Aveprocess that steal the Diseoryprocess; Sted the Marshals serncing Summans ‘amet Loss. ciel cpl fa tine — ee 1 To.stmmarize Mea h Dickson avoided Lenn exposed oe Supa another li by Lickson MYorney 1he suspect Ahad fhe ines: yi Fi ns Lip ea Oa